share torah logo

Genesis 13:6 - Wealth divides or unites?

Genesis 13:6 - בראשית 13:6

Hebrew Text

וְלֹא־נָשָׂא אֹתָם הָאָרֶץ לָשֶׁבֶת יַחְדָּו כִּי־הָיָה רְכוּשָׁם רָב וְלֹא יָכְלוּ לָשֶׁבֶת יַחְדָּו׃

English Translation

And the land was not able to bear them, that they might dwell together: for their substance was great, so that they could not dwell together.

Transliteration

Ve-lo nasa otam ha'aretz lashevet yachdav ki-haya rechusham rav ve-lo yachlu lashevet yachdav.

Hebrew Leining Text

וְלֹא־נָשָׂ֥א אֹתָ֛ם הָאָ֖רֶץ לָשֶׁ֣בֶת יַחְדָּ֑ו כִּֽי־הָיָ֤ה רְכוּשָׁם֙ רָ֔ב וְלֹ֥א יָֽכְל֖וּ לָשֶׁ֥בֶת יַחְדָּֽו׃
וְלֹא־נָשָׂ֥א אֹתָ֛ם הָאָ֖רֶץ לָשֶׁ֣בֶת יַחְדָּ֑ו כִּֽי־הָיָ֤ה רְכוּשָׁם֙ רָ֔ב וְלֹ֥א יָֽכְל֖וּ לָשֶׁ֥בֶת יַחְדָּֽו׃

🎵 Listen to leining

Parasha Commentary

Context of the Verse

This verse (Bereshit 13:6) describes the situation between Avram (later Avraham) and his nephew Lot after they returned from Egypt. Their flocks and possessions had grown so large that the land could not sustain both of them dwelling together, leading to strife between their herdsmen.

Rashi's Explanation

Rashi explains that the phrase "the land was not able to bear them" refers to the limited grazing land available for their numerous flocks. He notes that this was not due to the land's inherent insufficiency, but because they were not yet entitled to the full possession of Eretz Yisrael (as the Canaanites and Perizzites still dwelled there). This temporary limitation foreshadowed future inheritances.

Ibn Ezra's Perspective

Ibn Ezra focuses on the practical aspect, stating that their substantial wealth in livestock required extensive grazing areas. The concentration of their herds in one region made cohabitation impossible without conflict over resources.

Midrashic Interpretation

The Midrash (Bereshit Rabbah 41:5) elaborates that their inability to dwell together stemmed from more than just physical space. It highlights the fundamental difference in their characters - Avram's righteousness versus Lot's attraction to the wickedness of Sodom. The Midrash sees this as the deeper reason they couldn't remain together.

Ramban's Insight

Ramban suggests this episode teaches that material prosperity can sometimes lead to conflict, even among relatives. He notes this was providential, as it led to Avram's separation from Lot before Lot became influenced by Sodom's wickedness.

Halachic Implication

The Talmud (Sanhedrin 109a) derives from this verse the principle that disputes over property can lead to larger conflicts, emphasizing the importance of maintaining peaceful relations even when material interests diverge.

Lessons from the Verse

  • The potential for wealth to create discord even among family
  • Divine Providence in separating the righteous from negative influences
  • The importance of making space for others' needs and livelihoods
  • How material constraints can serve higher spiritual purposes

📚 Talmud Citations

This verse is quoted in the Talmud.

📖 Sanhedrin 109a
The verse is referenced in the context of discussing the strife between Lot and Abraham, illustrating how their wealth led to conflict and separation.

Frequently Asked Questions

Q: What does Genesis 13:6 mean when it says 'the land was not able to bear them'?
A: According to Rashi, the land could not physically support both Avram (Abraham) and Lot's large flocks and herds. Their wealth in livestock was so great that there wasn't enough pastureland for all their animals to graze together in the same area.
Q: Why was it important that Avram and Lot couldn't dwell together?
A: The Midrash explains this separation was divinely orchestrated to prevent future conflicts between their descendants. Their inability to dwell together peacefully led to Avram generously offering Lot first choice of land, demonstrating Avram's righteousness and setting the stage for their separate destinies.
Q: What lesson can we learn from Genesis 13:6 about wealth and relationships?
A: The Talmud (Sanhedrin 109a) derives from this verse that material wealth can strain relationships. Even between righteous individuals like Avram and Lot, excessive possessions created tension. This teaches us to prioritize relationships over material gain and be willing to make sacrifices for peace.
Q: How does the concept of 'not being able to dwell together' apply today?
A: Rambam (Hilchot Shecheinim) applies this principle to modern neighborly relations, teaching that when living conditions become too crowded or contentious, it may be preferable to separate peacefully rather than force coexistence that leads to conflict, following Avram's example of seeking shalom (peace).
Q: Why does the Torah emphasize that their possessions were so great?
A: The Sforno explains that this detail shows their wealth was a blessing from Hashem, but also a test. While material success is good, it must be managed properly. The verse teaches that blessings can sometimes create new challenges that require wisdom to navigate.