Genesis 34:11 - Can love redeem sin?

Genesis 34:11 - בראשית 34:11

Hebrew Text

וַיֹּאמֶר שְׁכֶם אֶל־אָבִיה וְאֶל־אַחֶיהָ אֶמְצָא־חֵן בְּעֵינֵיכֶם וַאֲשֶׁר תֹּאמְרוּ אֵלַי אֶתֵּן׃

English Translation

And Shekhem said to her father and to her brethren, Let me find favour in your eyes, and what you shall say to me I will give.

Transliteration

Va'yomer Shechem el-aviha ve'el-acheha emtza-chen be'eneichem va'asher tomru elai eten.

Hebrew Leining Text

וַיֹּ֤אמֶר שְׁכֶם֙ אֶל־אָבִ֣יהָ וְאֶל־אַחֶ֔יהָ אֶמְצָא־חֵ֖ן בְּעֵינֵיכֶ֑ם וַאֲשֶׁ֥ר תֹּאמְר֛וּ אֵלַ֖י אֶתֵּֽן׃

🎵 Listen to leining

Parasha Commentary

Context of the Verse

The verse (Bereshit 34:11) records the words of Shekhem, son of Chamor, after he had taken Dinah, the daughter of Yaakov, and wished to marry her. Shekhem speaks to Dinah's father (Yaakov) and brothers, seeking their favor and offering to pay any price they demand.

Rashi's Commentary

Rashi explains that Shekhem's words, "Let me find favor in your eyes", indicate his attempt to appease Yaakov and his sons after the grievous act he had committed. Rashi notes that Shekhem was willing to give whatever they asked, whether in terms of money or other demands, to atone for his wrongdoing (Rashi on Bereshit 34:11).

Rambam's Perspective on Repentance

While Rambam does not comment directly on this verse, his principles of teshuvah (repentance) in Hilchot Teshuvah can be applied. Shekhem's offer to give whatever is demanded may resemble an attempt at restitution, but true repentance requires sincere regret and a commitment not to repeat the sin—something Shekhem does not demonstrate fully (Rambam, Hilchot Teshuvah 2:1-2).

Midrashic Interpretation

The Midrash (Bereshit Rabbah 80:7) highlights the insincerity of Shekhem's words. Despite his offer to give generously, his primary motivation was selfish—he desired Dinah and sought to legitimize his actions rather than express genuine remorse. The Midrash contrasts this with the proper way to seek forgiveness, which requires humility and true repentance.

Moral Lessons from the Verse

  • Empty Promises vs. Genuine Repentance: Shekhem’s willingness to pay any price does not equate to true atonement, teaching that material compensation alone is insufficient without sincere remorse.
  • Guard Against Deception: Yaakov’s sons later respond with cunning (Bereshit 34:13-17), illustrating the dangers of engaging with those who manipulate rather than repent honestly.
  • The Sanctity of Relationships: The episode underscores the Torah’s emphasis on moral conduct in relationships, as opposed to coercion or exploitation.

Ibn Ezra's Linguistic Insight

Ibn Ezra notes that Shekhem’s phrasing, "what you shall say to me I will give", is unusually broad, suggesting he was prepared to offer exorbitant sums. However, this further reveals his desperation and lack of moral clarity, as true justice cannot be bought (Ibn Ezra on Bereshit 34:11).

📚 Talmud Citations

This verse is not quoted in the Talmud.

Frequently Asked Questions

Q: What does Shekhem mean when he says 'Let me find favor in your eyes' in Genesis 34:11?
A: Shekhem is attempting to appease Dinah's family after abducting her. According to Rashi, his words show insincerity—he speaks politely but ignores the severity of his actions. The Torah highlights his flawed character by contrasting his smooth words with his immoral behavior.
Q: Why does Shekhem offer to give whatever Dinah's family asks in Genesis 34:11?
A: Shekhem tries to negotiate after committing a grave sin. The Midrash (Bereishit Rabbah) explains that he believed material compensation could resolve the situation, showing his distorted values. Jewish law (Rambam, Hilchot Naarah Betulah) teaches that no monetary payment can absolve such a crime.
Q: What lesson can we learn from Shekhem's words in Genesis 34:11?
A: The verse teaches that words alone cannot rectify wrongdoing. As the Talmud (Sanhedrin 57a) discusses, true repentance requires sincere change—not just empty promises. Shekhem's attempt to 'buy forgiveness' without genuine remorse serves as a warning about superficial apologies.
Q: How does this verse relate to Jewish views on consent and morality?
A: Traditional Jewish sources (Talmud, Ketubot 51b) derive from this episode that relationships require mutual consent and dignity. Shekhem's actions—and his belated attempt to negotiate—violate Torah principles of morality, emphasizing that no compensation justifies coercion.