Genesis 37:35 - Can mourning ever find comfort?

Genesis 37:35 - בראשית 37:35

Hebrew Text

וַיָּקֻמוּ כָל־בָּנָיו וְכָל־בְּנֹתָיו לְנַחֲמוֹ וַיְמָאֵן לְהִתְנַחֵם וַיֹּאמֶר כִּי־אֵרֵד אֶל־בְּנִי אָבֵל שְׁאֹלָה וַיֵּבְךְּ אֹתוֹ אָבִיו׃

English Translation

And all his sons and all his daughters rose up to comfort him; but he refused to be comforted; and he said, For I will go down to my son mourning into She᾽ol. Thus his father wept for him.

Transliteration

Vayakumu kol-banav vechol-bnotav lenachamo vayema'en lehitnacheim vayomer ki-ered el-beni avel she'ola vayevk oto aviv.

Hebrew Leining Text

וַיָּקֻ֩מוּ֩ כׇל־בָּנָ֨יו וְכׇל־בְּנֹתָ֜יו לְנַחֲמ֗וֹ וַיְמָאֵן֙ לְהִתְנַחֵ֔ם וַיֹּ֕אמֶר כִּֽי־אֵרֵ֧ד אֶל־בְּנִ֛י אָבֵ֖ל שְׁאֹ֑לָה וַיֵּ֥בְךְּ אֹת֖וֹ אָבִֽיו׃

🎵 Listen to leining

Parasha Commentary

Context of the Verse

This verse (Genesis 37:35) describes Yaakov Avinu's reaction to the news of Yosef's apparent death. His children attempt to comfort him, but he refuses, expressing his intention to mourn until he joins Yosef in She'ol (the grave). This occurs after Yosef's brothers deceive Yaakov by presenting Yosef's bloodstained coat, leading him to believe Yosef was killed by a wild animal.

Yaakov's Refusal to be Comforted

Rashi explains that Yaakov could not accept consolation because Yosef was still alive (though Yaakov did not know this). The Gemara (Brachos 5b) teaches that one cannot be comforted for a living person mistakenly thought to be dead, as the Divine decree of mourning does not apply in such cases. Ramban adds that Yaakov's prophetic spirit sensed Yosef was alive, preventing him from accepting comfort.

The Term "She'ol"

Ibn Ezra interprets She'ol simply as the grave. However, Ramban suggests it refers to the afterlife realm where souls reside. This aligns with Kabbalistic understandings of She'ol as having different levels - the righteous experience it differently than the wicked.

Yaakov's Daughters

The mention of "all his daughters" raises questions, as the Torah previously mentions only one daughter, Dinah. Rashi explains this refers to his daughters-in-law, while Ibn Ezra suggests Yaakov had other unnamed daughters. The Midrash (Bereishis Rabbah 84:21) states these were twin sisters born with each son.

Psychological and Halachic Dimensions

  • The Kli Yakar notes that Yaakov's refusal to be comforted demonstrates the unique bond between parent and child - while other losses may eventually be consoled, the loss of a child leaves a permanent void.
  • Halachically, this informs our understanding of mourning periods. The Shulchan Aruch (Yoreh De'ah 394:1) rules that while mourning for others has limits, parents may mourn a child indefinitely.
  • The Malbim emphasizes that Yaakov's statement "I will go down to my son mourning" shows his commitment to perpetual mourning, unlike conventional mourning periods that conclude.

Hidden Meaning in the Text

The Ba'al HaTurim finds significance in the word "אָבֵל" (mourning) having the same numerical value (34) as "בן" (son), hinting at the inseparable connection between Yaakov and Yosef. The Zohar sees deeper mystical meaning in Yaakov's descent into mourning foreshadowing the future exile and redemption of the Jewish people.

📚 Talmud Citations

This verse is quoted in the Talmud.

📖 Moed Katan 21b
The verse is referenced in the context of discussing mourning practices, illustrating how Jacob refused to be comforted after the loss of his son Joseph.

Frequently Asked Questions

Q: Why did Jacob refuse to be comforted after Joseph's disappearance?
A: According to Rashi and the Midrash (Bereshit Rabbah 84:21), Jacob refused comfort because he believed Joseph was still alive (since he had not received definitive proof of Joseph's death). The Torah teaches that one should not accept comfort for a living person, as that would imply giving up hope.
Q: What does 'going down to Sheol' mean in this verse?
A: In traditional Jewish interpretation (see Ramban on this verse), Sheol refers to the grave or the afterlife. Jacob was expressing that his grief would accompany him until death. The Talmud (Berachot 5b) explains that excessive mourning can spiritually weaken a person, which is why Jewish law sets boundaries for mourning periods.
Q: Why does the Torah mention both sons and daughters comforting Jacob?
A: While the Torah elsewhere mentions Jacob having only one daughter (Dinah), Rashi explains that 'daughters' here refers to daughters-in-law (like Tamar, who was married to Er and Onan). This teaches that extended family should participate in comforting mourners, a principle that became part of Jewish mourning practices (Shulchan Aruch, Yoreh De'ah 376).
Q: What lesson can we learn from Jacob's mourning for Joseph?
A: The Midrash (Tanchuma Vayeshev 8) teaches that Jacob's excessive mourning (lasting 22 years) was partially a consequence of his favoring Joseph, reminding us of the importance of treating all children equally. However, it also demonstrates the deep love between parent and child, which the Talmud (Kiddushin 30b) considers fundamental to Jewish family values.
Q: How does Jewish tradition view refusing comfort like Jacob did?
A: While Jacob's refusal was unique to his situation (believing Joseph alive), Jewish law (as codified in Rambam's Hilchot Avel 13:11) generally requires mourners to eventually accept comfort and return to normal life after appropriate mourning periods, as prolonged grief can be harmful both spiritually and emotionally.