share torah logo

Exodus 16:2 - Complaining in the wilderness?

Exodus 16:2 - שמות 16:2

Hebrew Text

וילינו [וַיִּלּוֹנוּ] כָּל־עֲדַת בְּנֵי־יִשְׂרָאֵל עַל־מֹשֶׁה וְעַל־אַהֲרֹן בַּמִּדְבָּר׃

English Translation

And the whole congregation of the children of Yisra᾽el murmured against Moshe and Aharon in the wilderness:

Transliteration

Vayilonu kol-adat bnei-yisrael al-moshe ve'al-aharon bamidbar.

Hebrew Leining Text

<span class="mam-kq"><span class="mam-kq-k">(וילינו)</span> <span class="mam-kq-q">[וַיִּלּ֜וֹנוּ]</span></span> כׇּל־עֲדַ֧ת בְּנֵי־יִשְׂרָאֵ֛ל עַל־מֹשֶׁ֥ה וְעַֽל־אַהֲרֹ֖ן בַּמִּדְבָּֽר׃
(וילינו) [וַיִּלּ֜וֹנוּ] כׇּל־עֲדַ֧ת בְּנֵי־יִשְׂרָאֵ֛ל עַל־מֹשֶׁ֥ה וְעַֽל־אַהֲרֹ֖ן בַּמִּדְבָּֽר׃

🎵 Listen to leining

Parasha Commentary

Context of the Verse

The verse (Bamidbar 14:2) describes the murmuring of Bnei Yisrael against Moshe and Aharon in the wilderness. This event occurs after the meraglim (spies) return with a negative report about Eretz Yisrael, leading to widespread fear and rebellion among the people.

Rashi's Explanation

Rashi explains that the term "וילינו" (vayilonu) comes from the root לון, meaning "to lodge" or "to complain." He notes that the people lodged complaints against Moshe and Aharon, expressing dissatisfaction with their leadership. Rashi further connects this to their lack of faith in Hashem, as their murmuring was ultimately a rejection of the divine promise to bring them into the land.

Rambam's Perspective

Rambam (Hilchot De'ot 2:3) discusses how complaining and discontent stem from a lack of gratitude and trust in Hashem. The murmuring in the wilderness reflects a broader spiritual failing—Bnei Yisrael's inability to internalize the miracles they had witnessed and to trust in divine providence.

Midrashic Insights

  • The Midrash Tanchuma (Shelach 9) compares the murmuring of Bnei Yisrael to the behavior of spoiled children who, despite being provided for, constantly find fault with their benefactors.
  • Midrash Bamidbar Rabbah (16:20) emphasizes that their complaints were not merely about physical hardships but represented a deeper rebellion against the mission of entering Eretz Yisrael.

Lessons from the Talmud

The Talmud (Sotah 35a) discusses how the spies' report and the subsequent murmuring led to the decree of wandering for 40 years. The Gemara highlights that the people's lack of faith caused them to see themselves as helpless, despite Hashem's constant protection.

Spiritual Implications

This episode serves as a cautionary tale about the dangers of ingratitude and lack of bitachon (trust in Hashem). Orthodox Jewish tradition teaches that murmuring against divinely appointed leaders—like Moshe and Aharon—reflects a broader rejection of divine authority. The wilderness generation's failure serves as a reminder to cultivate faith and appreciation for Hashem's guidance in all circumstances.

📚 Talmud Citations

This verse is quoted in the Talmud.

📖 Ta'anit 20b
The verse is referenced in the context of discussing the complaints of the Israelites in the wilderness and the leadership of Moses and Aaron.
📖 Sanhedrin 110a
The murmuring of the Israelites is mentioned in a discussion about the consequences of speaking against leaders and the importance of unity.

Frequently Asked Questions

Q: Why did the Israelites complain against Moses and Aaron in the wilderness?
A: The Israelites complained because they were hungry and lacked food in the wilderness. According to Rashi, their complaint showed a lack of trust in Hashem, who had already performed miracles for them like the splitting of the Red Sea. The Midrash (Shemot Rabbah 25:5) explains that their murmuring was unjustified because they still had some provisions left from Egypt.
Q: What lesson can we learn from the Israelites complaining in the wilderness?
A: The verse teaches us the importance of gratitude and trust in Hashem, even in difficult situations. The Rambam (Hilchot De'ot 2:3) explains that complaining reflects a negative character trait, while patience and faith are virtues. The Talmud (Berachot 5a) also teaches that hardships can be opportunities for spiritual growth.
Q: How does this verse relate to the manna that followed?
A: This complaint led directly to Hashem providing manna from heaven (Exodus 16:4). The Talmud (Yoma 75b) explains that the manna was a miraculous food that tasted like whatever the eater desired, showing Hashem's kindness even when the people complained. Rashi notes that the manna came in response to their need, not because of their complaints.
Q: Why does the Torah mention that this happened 'in the wilderness'?
A: The wilderness setting emphasizes the people's vulnerability and dependence on Hashem. The Midrash (Bamidbar Rabbah 1:7) explains that the wilderness is a place of testing and spiritual refinement. Ramban (Nachmanides) notes that the wilderness experience was meant to teach complete reliance on Divine providence.
Q: What does this teach us about leadership challenges?
A: This verse shows that even great leaders like Moses and Aaron faced criticism. The Talmud (Sanhedrin 8a) derives from here that leaders must be patient with communal complaints. Rambam (Hilchot Sanhedrin 25:1) teaches that leaders should respond with wisdom and compassion, as Moses did by praying for the people rather than reacting angrily.