
Join Our Newsletter To Be Informed When New Videos Are Posted
Join the thousands of fellow Studends who rely on our videos to learn how to read the bible in Hebrew for free!
Hebrew Text
כִּי־יִתֵּן אִישׁ אֶל־רֵעֵהוּ כֶּסֶף אוֹ־כֵלִים לִשְׁמֹר וְגֻנַּב מִבֵּית הָאִישׁ אִם־יִמָּצֵא הַגַּנָּב יְשַׁלֵּם שְׁנָיִם׃
English Translation
If a man shall deliver to his neighbour money or vessels to keep, and it be stolen out of the man’s house; if the thief be found, he shall pay double.
Transliteration
Ki-yiten ish el-re'ehu kesef o-kelim lishmor v'gunav mibeit ha'ish im-yimatzei hagannav yeshalem shnayim.
Hebrew Leining Text
כִּֽי־יִתֵּן֩ אִ֨ישׁ אֶל־רֵעֵ֜הוּ כֶּ֤סֶף אֽוֹ־כֵלִים֙ לִשְׁמֹ֔ר וְגֻנַּ֖ב מִבֵּ֣ית הָאִ֑ישׁ אִם־יִמָּצֵ֥א הַגַּנָּ֖ב יְשַׁלֵּ֥ם שְׁנָֽיִם׃
Parasha Commentary
📚 Talmud Citations
This verse is quoted in the Talmud.
📖 Bava Metzia 34b
The verse is discussed in the context of the laws regarding a paid guardian (shomer sakhar) and the liability for theft.
📖 Bava Kamma 63b
The verse is referenced in a discussion about the penalties for theft and the obligations of those entrusted with another's property.
Overview of the Verse
The verse (Exodus 22:6) discusses the laws of a shomer chinam (an unpaid guardian) who is entrusted with another person's money or vessels for safekeeping. If the items are stolen from the guardian's possession, the Torah establishes that if the thief is found, he must pay double restitution (kefel). This law is part of a broader discussion in Parshat Mishpatim concerning financial responsibilities and liabilities.
Rashi's Commentary
Rashi (Exodus 22:6) explains that this verse applies specifically to an unpaid guardian (shomer chinam), who is exempt from paying for the loss if the theft occurs without negligence on his part. However, if the thief is caught, the thief must repay double the stolen amount, as stated in Exodus 22:3. Rashi emphasizes that the guardian is only responsible to testify truthfully about the theft but is not liable for the loss.
Rambam's Legal Analysis
In Hilchot She’eilah u’Pikadon (Laws of Borrowing and Deposits 3:1), the Rambam clarifies that an unpaid guardian is only liable if he was negligent in safeguarding the deposited items. If the theft occurs despite reasonable precautions, the guardian is exempt. However, if the thief is apprehended, the thief—not the guardian—must compensate the owner with double payment, as derived from this verse.
Talmudic Discussion (Bava Metzia 34b)
The Talmud analyzes this verse in the context of different types of guardians (shomrim). It distinguishes between an unpaid guardian (shomer chinam) and a paid guardian (shomer sachar), noting that the unpaid guardian is only liable for negligence. The Gemara further discusses whether the double payment by the thief absolves the guardian from any oath requirement, concluding that the guardian must still take an oath (shevu’ah) to confirm his lack of negligence.
Midrashic Insight (Mechilta)
The Mechilta (Mishpatim 15) connects this verse to the broader principle of honesty in financial dealings. It teaches that even in cases of theft, justice must be upheld by ensuring proper restitution. The double payment serves as both compensation and a deterrent against theft, reinforcing societal trust in monetary transactions.
Key Halachic Principles