Exodus 22:15 - Seduction's costly marital obligation

Exodus 22:15 - שמות 22:15

Hebrew Text

וְכִי־יְפַתֶּה אִישׁ בְּתוּלָה אֲשֶׁר לֹא־אֹרָשָׂה וְשָׁכַב עִמָּהּ מָהֹר יִמְהָרֶנָּה לּוֹ לְאִשָּׁה׃

English Translation

And if a man seduce a virgin that is not betrothed, and lie with her, he shall pay the bride price for her to be his wife.

Transliteration

Vechi-yefateh ish betulah asher lo-orasa veshakhav imah mohar yimharenah lo le'ishah.

Hebrew Leining Text

וְכִֽי־יְפַתֶּ֣ה אִ֗ישׁ בְּתוּלָ֛ה אֲשֶׁ֥ר לֹא־אֹרָ֖שָׂה וְשָׁכַ֣ב עִמָּ֑הּ מָהֹ֛ר יִמְהָרֶ֥נָּה לּ֖וֹ לְאִשָּֽׁה׃

🎵 Listen to leining

Parasha Commentary

Parshat Mishpatim: The Law of the Seducer

The verse (Shemot 22:15) addresses the case of a man who seduces an unbetrothed virgin (na'arah me'orasah) and engages in relations with her. The Torah mandates that he must pay the mohar (bride price) and marry her, unless her father refuses to give her to him (as explained in the following verse).

Rashi's Explanation

Rashi (based on Mechilta and Ketubot 39a) clarifies that the term mohar refers to the standard dowry of fifty silver shekels, as specified in Devarim 22:29 for cases of rape. The seducer must pay this amount regardless of whether he ultimately marries her, as it compensates for the diminution of her value in marriage prospects.

Halachic Implications from the Talmud

  • Ketubot 39a: The Gemara establishes that the seducer is obligated in three payments: the mohar, compensation for embarrassment (boshet), and compensation for damages (pegam).
  • Mishneh Torah (Hilchot Naarah Betulah 1:3): Rambam rules that if the father refuses the marriage, the seducer must still pay the full fifty shekels, and the father may choose to keep his daughter unmarried to the seducer.

Moral and Ethical Dimensions

The Sefer HaChinuch (Mitzvah 48) explains that this law serves as a deterrent against immoral behavior. By imposing financial and marital obligations, the Torah discourages casual relations and emphasizes the sanctity of marriage. The Kli Yakar adds that the requirement to marry (unless refused by the father) reflects the Torah's preference for rectifying wrongs through commitment rather than abandonment.

Distinction from Rape Cases

Ibn Ezra notes that while the penalty is identical to rape cases (fifty shekels), the Torah treats seduction as less severe since it involves mutual consent. Nevertheless, both scenarios require the man to take responsibility for his actions through marriage or financial restitution.

📚 Talmud Citations

This verse is quoted in the Talmud.

📖 Ketubot 39a
The verse is discussed in the context of the laws regarding seduction and the financial obligations of the seducer.
📖 Sanhedrin 56b
The verse is referenced in the discussion of the Noachide laws and the prohibition of sexual immorality.

Frequently Asked Questions

Q: What does Exodus 22:15 mean?
A: Exodus 22:15 discusses the case where a man seduces an unbetrothed virgin and lies with her. According to Torah law, he must pay the 'mohar' (bride price) and marry her, unless her father refuses to allow the marriage (Rashi, Mechilta). This law emphasizes responsibility for one's actions and protecting the dignity of the woman.
Q: Why is the 'mohar' (bride price) important in this verse?
A: The mohar serves as both compensation to the woman's family and a formal commitment to marriage. The Talmud (Kiddushin 2a) explains that the mohar establishes the marital bond. Rambam (Hilchos Naarah Besulah 1:2-3) elaborates that this payment demonstrates the man's seriousness in taking responsibility for his actions.
Q: What if the father refuses the marriage in this case?
A: While the Torah states the man must marry her, the father has the right to refuse (Rashi on Exodus 22:16). In such cases, the man still must pay the full mohar as a fine (Mechilta). This shows that even if marriage doesn't proceed, there are still consequences for improper behavior.
Q: How does this law apply today without the mohar system?
A: While we don't practice the mohar system today, the underlying principles remain relevant: 1) Taking responsibility for one's actions, 2) Respecting women's dignity, and 3) Understanding that intimate relationships require serious commitment (Rambam, Hilchos Ishus 1:1-2). Contemporary halacha maintains strict standards about proper relationships between men and women.
Q: What's the difference between this case and rape in Torah law?
A: This verse deals with seduction (with consent), while Deuteronomy 22:25-27 discusses rape. The key difference is that in rape cases: 1) There's no option for the rapist to marry the victim, 2) The punishment is more severe, and 3) No mohar is paid (Mechilta, Sifri). Torah law distinguishes clearly between these situations.