Leviticus 14:54 - Torah's guide for skin afflictions

Leviticus 14:54 - ויקרא 14:54

Hebrew Text

זֹאת הַתּוֹרָה לְכָל־נֶגַע הַצָּרַעַת וְלַנָּתֶק׃

English Translation

This is the Tora for all manner of plague of żara῾at, and the patch,

Transliteration

Zot haTorah lechol-nega hatzara'at velanatek.

Hebrew Leining Text

זֹ֖את הַתּוֹרָ֑ה לְכׇל־נֶ֥גַע הַצָּרַ֖עַת וְלַנָּֽתֶק׃

🎵 Listen to leining

Parasha Commentary

Overview of the Verse

The verse, זֹאת הַתּוֹרָה לְכָל־נֶגַע הַצָּרַעַת וְלַנָּתֶק ("This is the Tora for all manner of plague of żara῾at, and the patch"), introduces the detailed laws concerning żara῾at (often translated as leprosy, though it is not the same as the medical condition) and netek (a patch or bald spot). These laws are found in Parashat Tazria-Metzora (Vayikra 13-14) and are part of the broader system of tum’ah (ritual impurity) and taharah (ritual purity).

Meaning of Żara῾at

According to Rashi (Vayikra 13:2), żara῾at is not merely a physical ailment but a spiritual affliction, often resulting from sins such as lashon hara (evil speech), arrogance, or stinginess. The Talmud (Arachin 16a) elaborates that żara῾at serves as a divine punishment to prompt introspection and repentance.

  • Rambam (Hilchot Tumat Tzara’at 16:10): Emphasizes that żara῾at is a supernatural phenomenon, not a natural disease, and its appearance on a person’s skin, garments, or home is a sign from Hashem.
  • Midrash Vayikra Rabbah (17:3): Compares żara῾at to the "plagues of Egypt," suggesting it is a manifestation of divine intervention.

The Role of the Kohen

The verse underscores that the diagnosis and purification process for żara῾at must be conducted by a kohen (priest), not a physician. Rashi (Vayikra 13:2) explains that the kohen serves as a spiritual arbiter, determining whether the affliction is indeed tamei (impure) or tahor (pure).

The Concept of Netek (Patch or Bald Spot)

The verse also mentions netek, a bald spot that may indicate impurity. The Talmud (Nega’im 6:7) differentiates between natural baldness and netek, which is a sign of tum’ah. Rambam (Hilchot Tumat Tzara’at 8:1) notes that netek follows similar inspection and purification procedures as żara῾at.

Spiritual Lessons

The laws of żara῾at and netek teach profound moral and ethical lessons:

  • Accountability: They remind individuals of the consequences of harmful speech and behavior (Talmud, Arachin 15b).
  • Repentance: The isolation period (hitzdakut) for the afflicted person is a time for teshuvah (repentance) (Rambam, Hilchot Tumat Tzara’at 16:10).
  • Divine Providence: The supernatural nature of żara῾at highlights Hashem’s direct involvement in human affairs (Midrash Tanchuma, Metzora 3).

📚 Talmud Citations

This verse is quoted in the Talmud.

📖 Nega'im 3:1
The verse is referenced in the Mishnah as part of the discussion on the laws concerning various types of skin afflictions (negaim) and their classifications.
📖 Sotah 5a
The verse is cited in a broader discussion about the spiritual implications of afflictions and their purification processes.

Frequently Asked Questions

Q: What does 'żara῾at' mean in Leviticus 14:54?
A: In Leviticus 14:54, 'żara῾at' refers to a spiritual affliction often mistranslated as 'leprosy.' According to Rashi and the Talmud (Arachin 15b), it is not a medical condition but a supernatural sign of spiritual impurity caused by sins like gossip, arrogance, or stinginess. The Torah provides detailed laws for diagnosing and purifying it.
Q: Why does the Torah discuss 'żara῾at' in such detail?
A: The Torah details 'żara῾at' to teach that physical phenomena can reflect spiritual states. Rambam (Hilchot Tumat Tzaraat 16:10) explains it as a divine warning to repent from harmful speech or behavior. The intricate purification process (involving a kohen, sacrifices, and isolation) underscores the gravity of ethical conduct in Jewish life.
Q: Does 'żara῾at' exist today?
A: Traditional Jewish sources (Rambam, Hilchot Tumat Tzaraat 1:3) state that 'żara῾at' ceased with the destruction of the Second Temple, as it required a kohen's inspection and Temple rituals. However, the moral lessons—avoiding gossip (lashon hara) and cultivating humility—remain eternally relevant (Arachin 16a).
Q: What is the connection between 'żara῾at' and speech?
A: The Talmud (Arachin 15b) links 'żara῾at' primarily to lashon hara (harmful speech), citing Miriam’s temporary affliction after speaking negatively about Moshe (Numbers 12:10). The affliction’s public nature (on skin, clothes, or homes) mirrors how gossip spreads and damages communities, emphasizing speech’s sanctity.
Q: How does this verse apply to us today?
A: While 'żara῾at' no longer manifests physically, the verse reminds us to monitor our behavior. The Midrash (Vayikra Rabbah 16:1) compares the kohen’s inspection to self-reflection: just as a kohen examined the affliction, we must examine our actions and correct ethical flaws, especially in speech and interpersonal conduct.