Numbers 21:26 - Emori's conquest from Moav

Numbers 21:26 - במדבר 21:26

Hebrew Text

כִּי חֶשְׁבּוֹן עִיר סִיחֹן מֶלֶךְ הָאֱמֹרִי הִוא וְהוּא נִלְחַם בְּמֶלֶךְ מוֹאָב הָרִאשׁוֹן וַיִּקַּח אֶת־כָּל־אַרְצוֹ מִיָּדוֹ עַד־אַרְנֹן׃

English Translation

For Ḥeshbon was the city of Siĥon the king of the Emori, who had fought against the former king of Mo᾽av, and taken all his land out of his hand, as far as Arnon.

Transliteration

Ki Cheshbon ir Sichon melech ha'Emori hi vehu nilcham bemelech Moav harishon vayikach et kol artzo miyado ad Arnon.

Hebrew Leining Text

כִּ֣י חֶשְׁבּ֔וֹן עִ֗יר סִיחֹ֛ן מֶ֥לֶךְ הָאֱמֹרִ֖י הִ֑וא וְה֣וּא נִלְחַ֗ם בְּמֶ֤לֶךְ מוֹאָב֙ הָֽרִאשׁ֔וֹן וַיִּקַּ֧ח אֶת־כׇּל־אַרְצ֛וֹ מִיָּד֖וֹ עַד־אַרְנֹֽן׃

🎵 Listen to leining

Parasha Commentary

Context of the Verse

This verse appears in Bamidbar (Numbers) 21:26, recounting the historical background of the land east of the Jordan River before Bnei Yisrael's conquest. The verse explains that Ḥeshbon was originally a Moabite city but was conquered by Sihon, king of the Emorites, who took it from Moav in battle. This historical note is significant because it establishes the legitimacy of Israel's claim to the land after defeating Sihon.

Rashi's Commentary

Rashi (on Bamidbar 21:26) explains that this verse serves as a response to Moav's later claims against Israel. The Torah records this history to demonstrate that Sihon had already taken this land from Moav, so Israel was not seizing Moabite territory but rather land that had become Emorite property. Rashi cites Midrash Tanchuma (Chukat 24), which emphasizes that this was a divine arrangement—Hashem allowed Sihon to conquer Moav first so that Israel would not be morally culpable for taking land directly from Moav (since Moav was descended from Lot, and Hashem had forbidden Israel from provoking them, as stated in Devarim 2:9).

Ramban's Insight

Ramban (Nachmanides) adds that the verse underscores the providential nature of Israel's conquests. He notes that Sihon's earlier war against Moav was part of Hashem's plan to prepare the land for Israel. By the time Bnei Yisrael arrived, the land was no longer under Moabite control, thus removing any ethical dilemma in conquering it. Ramban also connects this to the broader theme of Eretz Yisrael being apportioned according to divine will.

Midrashic Interpretation

The Midrash Rabbah (Bamidbar Rabbah 19:25) elaborates on the phrase "the former king of Moav", suggesting that Sihon defeated a particularly powerful Moabite ruler, demonstrating his military strength. This further highlights that Israel's subsequent victory over Sihon was miraculous, as they overcame a formidable enemy who had himself conquered others.

Halachic Implications

  • Land Ownership: The verse establishes that the land was legitimately acquired by Israel, as it had changed hands from Moav to Sihon before Israel's conquest.
  • Divine Justice: The sequence of events reflects Hashem's precision in ensuring Israel's actions were morally justified, avoiding conflict with Moav due to their ancestral ties to Avraham through Lot.
  • Historical Validation: The Torah includes this detail to counter future claims by neighboring nations, as seen in later disputes (e.g., in Sefer Shoftim).

📚 Talmud Citations

This verse is not quoted in the Talmud.

Frequently Asked Questions

Q: What does Numbers 21:26 mean?
A: This verse explains that the city of Heshbon originally belonged to the Moabites, but Sihon, king of the Amorites, conquered it and took control of the land up to the Arnon River. It provides historical context for the Israelites' later conquest of this territory.
Q: Why is this verse important in the Torah?
A: This verse is important because it establishes the legitimacy of Israel's claim to this territory when they later conquered it from the Amorites. According to Rashi, this shows that the land wasn't originally Moabite property, so Israel wasn't taking land that rightfully belonged to Moab.
Q: What lesson can we learn from Numbers 21:26?
A: We learn that historical context matters in understanding biblical narratives. The Torah includes this background to show that territorial claims have complex histories. The Midrash teaches that this reminds us to investigate the full story before making judgments about ownership or rights.
Q: How does this verse connect to the Israelites' journey?
A: This verse explains why the Israelites were able to pass through this area and eventually settle there. Since Sihon had conquered it from Moab, the Israelites weren't violating Moab's territory when they later defeated Sihon and took possession of this land.
Q: What does 'as far as Arnon' refer to?
A: The Arnon River (modern Wadi Mujib in Jordan) was a natural boundary and important landmark. Rashi explains it marked the northern border of Moab's original territory before Sihon's conquest. The Torah specifies this to clarify exactly how far Sihon's conquest extended.