share torah logo

Numbers 36:12 - Daughters inherit, preserving tribal lineage?

Numbers 36:12 - במדבר 36:12

Hebrew Text

מִמִּשְׁפְּחֹת בְּנֵי־מְנַשֶּׁה בֶן־יוֹסֵף הָיוּ לְנָשִׁים וַתְּהִי נַחֲלָתָן עַל־מַטֵּה מִשְׁפַּחַת אֲבִיהֶן׃

English Translation

and they were married to the families of the sons of Menashshe the son of Yosef, and their inheritance remained in the tribe of the family of their father.

Transliteration

Mimishpechot bnei-menashe ben-yosef hayu lenashim vatehi nachalatam al-mateh mishpachat avihen.

Hebrew Leining Text

מִֽמִּשְׁפְּחֹ֛ת בְּנֵֽי־מְנַשֶּׁ֥ה בֶן־יוֹסֵ֖ף הָי֣וּ לְנָשִׁ֑ים וַתְּהִי֙ נַחֲלָתָ֔ן עַל־מַטֵּ֖ה מִשְׁפַּ֥חַת אֲבִיהֶֽן׃
מִֽמִּשְׁפְּחֹ֛ת בְּנֵֽי־מְנַשֶּׁ֥ה בֶן־יוֹסֵ֖ף הָי֣וּ לְנָשִׁ֑ים וַתְּהִי֙ נַחֲלָתָ֔ן עַל־מַטֵּ֖ה מִשְׁפַּ֥חַת אֲבִיהֶֽן׃

🎵 Listen to leining

Parasha Commentary

Context of the Verse

This verse (Bamidbar 36:12) concludes the narrative of the daughters of Tzelafchad, who petitioned Moshe for the right to inherit their father's portion in Eretz Yisrael since he had no sons. The verse describes how these daughters married within their own tribe, Bnei Menashe, ensuring their inheritance remained within their father's tribal lineage.

Rashi's Explanation

Rashi (Bamidbar 36:12) emphasizes that the daughters of Tzelafchad acted l'shem shamayim (for the sake of Heaven) by marrying within their tribe. Initially, they could have married anyone, but they chose to uphold the divine decree that inheritances should not transfer between tribes (Bamidbar 36:6-9). Rashi notes that this demonstrates their righteousness and commitment to preserving tribal boundaries as commanded by Hashem.

Halachic Implications (Rambam)

Rambam (Hilchos Nachalos 6:1) derives from this episode that the prohibition against transferring inheritances between tribes through marriage applies only to the generation entering Eretz Yisrael. However, the daughters of Tzelafchad set a precedent for voluntary adherence to this ideal even when not strictly required. This reflects the principle of lifnim mishuras hadin (going beyond the letter of the law) in matters of tribal unity and inheritance.

Midrashic Insights

  • The Midrash (Bamidbar Rabbah 21:12) praises the daughters of Tzelafchad for their wisdom and piety, noting that they married "worthy men" from their tribe who were fitting for them.
  • Another Midrash (Tanchuma Pinchas 9) highlights that their actions prevented strife among the tribes, as their marriages ensured no land would be lost from Menashe's portion.

Tribal Inheritance Principles

The Talmud (Bava Basra 120a) discusses how this incident established that daughters who inherit land must marry within their tribe to maintain tribal allotments. This became a foundational case for the laws of nachalas avos (paternal inheritance) in Jewish jurisprudence. The Sages derive from here that maintaining tribal boundaries in Eretz Yisrael is not merely a legal technicality but a spiritual imperative tied to the sanctity of the land.

📚 Talmud Citations

This verse is not quoted in the Talmud.

Frequently Asked Questions

Q: What is Numbers 36:12 about?
A: Numbers 36:12 discusses the daughters of Tzelofchad, who inherited their father's land since he had no sons. This verse explains that they married within their own tribe (Menashshe) to ensure the land inheritance would stay within their ancestral tribe, following the earlier commandment in Numbers 36.
Q: Why was it important for the daughters of Tzelofchad to marry within their tribe?
A: According to Rashi and the Talmud (Bava Batra 120a), marrying within their tribe prevented the transfer of land inheritance to other tribes during the Jubilee year. This maintained the tribal land divisions established when the Israelites entered Israel, fulfilling Hashem's plan for tribal territories.
Q: What lesson can we learn from Numbers 36:12 today?
A: The Midrash teaches that this verse shows the importance of both following halachah (Jewish law) and maintaining family continuity. Just as the daughters balanced their personal lives with tribal obligations, we learn to consider both individual needs and communal responsibilities in our decisions.