Join Our Newsletter To Be Informed When New Videos Are Posted
Join the thousands of fellow Studends who rely on our videos to learn how to read the bible in Hebrew for free!
Hebrew Text
וְאֶלְעָזָר בֶּן־אַהֲרֹן לָקַח־לוֹ מִבְּנוֹת פּוּטִיאֵל לוֹ לְאִשָּׁה וַתֵּלֶד לוֹ אֶת־פִּינְחָס אֵלֶּה רָאשֵׁי אֲבוֹת הַלְוִיִּם לְמִשְׁפְּחֹתָם׃
English Translation
And El῾azar Aharon’s son took him one of the daughters of Puti᾽el to wife; and she bore him Pineĥas: these are the heads of the fathers of the Levites according to their families.
Transliteration
Ve'Elazar ben-Aharon lakhah-lo mibnot Puti'el lo le'ishah vateiled lo et-Pinchas, eleh rashei avot haLevi'im lemishpechotam.
Hebrew Leining Text
וְאֶלְעָזָ֨ר בֶּֽן־אַהֲרֹ֜ן לָקַֽח־ל֨וֹ מִבְּנ֤וֹת פּֽוּטִיאֵל֙ ל֣וֹ לְאִשָּׁ֔ה וַתֵּ֥לֶד ל֖וֹ אֶת־פִּֽינְחָ֑ס אֵ֗לֶּה רָאשֵׁ֛י אֲב֥וֹת הַלְוִיִּ֖ם לְמִשְׁפְּחֹתָֽם׃
וְאֶלְעָזָ֨ר בֶּֽן־אַהֲרֹ֜ן לָקַֽח־ל֨וֹ מִבְּנ֤וֹת פּֽוּטִיאֵל֙ ל֣וֹ לְאִשָּׁ֔ה וַתֵּ֥לֶד ל֖וֹ אֶת־פִּֽינְחָ֑ס אֵ֗לֶּה רָאשֵׁ֛י אֲב֥וֹת הַלְוִיִּ֖ם לְמִשְׁפְּחֹתָֽם׃
🎵 Listen to leining
Parasha Commentary
📚 Talmud Citations
This verse is not quoted in the Talmud.
The Lineage of Pinchas
The verse (Exodus 6:25) describes Elazar, the son of Aharon, marrying a daughter of Putiel and fathering Pinchas. This seemingly straightforward genealogical note carries deeper significance in Orthodox Jewish tradition.
Who Was Putiel?
Rashi explains that "Puti'el" refers to Yisro (Jethro), who was called Putiel because he had fattened (pitem) calves for idol worship before repenting and converting to Judaism. Alternatively, Rashi cites an opinion that Putiel refers to Yosef, who overcame (pitpeit) his yetzer hara (evil inclination) when confronted by Potiphar's wife.
The Significance of Pinchas's Birth
The Ramban notes that this verse appears in the context of listing the families of Levi, emphasizing Pinchas's role as a leader. Though Pinchas was Aharon's grandson, he is mentioned here because:
Midrashic Insights
The Midrash (Sifrei) connects this verse to Pinchas's future role:
Halachic Implications
The Talmud (Bava Basra 109b) derives from this verse that: