
Join Our Newsletter To Be Informed When New Videos Are Posted
Join the thousands of fellow Studends who rely on our videos to learn how to read the bible in Hebrew for free!
Hebrew Text
וַיֵּצֵא אֲלֵהֶם לוֹט הַפֶּתְחָה וְהַדֶּלֶת סָגַר אַחֲרָיו׃
English Translation
And Lot went out at the door to them, and shut the door after him,
Transliteration
Vayetze alehem Lot hapetachah vehadelt sagar acharav.
Hebrew Leining Text
וַיֵּצֵ֧א אֲלֵהֶ֛ם ל֖וֹט הַפֶּ֑תְחָה וְהַדֶּ֖לֶת סָגַ֥ר אַחֲרָֽיו׃
וַיֵּצֵ֧א אֲלֵהֶ֛ם ל֖וֹט הַפֶּ֑תְחָה וְהַדֶּ֖לֶת סָגַ֥ר אַחֲרָֽיו׃
🎵 Listen to leining
Parasha Commentary
📚 Talmud Citations
This verse is not quoted in the Talmud.
Lot's Actions at the Door
The verse states: "וַיֵּצֵא אֲלֵהֶם לוֹט הַפֶּתְחָה וְהַדֶּלֶת סָגַר אַחֲרָיו" ("And Lot went out at the door to them, and shut the door after him"). This occurs when the men of Sodom demand that Lot hand over his guests (the angels in disguise). Rashi explains that Lot went outside to speak to the mob, closing the door behind him to protect his guests. This demonstrates his commitment to the mitzvah of hachnasat orchim (hospitality), even at great personal risk.
Symbolism of the Closed Door
The Midrash (Bereishit Rabbah 50:5) highlights that Lot's closing of the door signifies his attempt to separate himself from the wickedness of Sodom. By shutting the door, he symbolically distances himself from their corrupt ways, even though he had chosen to live among them. The Ramban adds that this act shows Lot's recognition of the moral boundary between his household and the depravity outside.
Contrast with Avraham's Hospitality
This contrast underscores the difference in their spiritual levels—Avraham proactively sought opportunities for kindness, while Lot reacted defensively.
Halachic Implications of Closing the Door
The Talmud (Sanhedrin 109a) discusses how the people of Sodom had decreed that hospitality was punishable by death. By closing the door, Lot not only protected his guests but also defied the immoral laws of his society. The Shulchan Aruch (Choshen Mishpat 427:8) later derives from this episode the principle that one must resist unjust decrees, even at personal risk, to uphold righteousness.