Leviticus 13:39 - Pure despite skin discoloration?

Leviticus 13:39 - ויקרא 13:39

Hebrew Text

וְרָאָה הַכֹּהֵן וְהִנֵּה בְעוֹר־בְּשָׂרָם בֶּהָרֹת כֵּהוֹת לְבָנֹת בֹּהַק הוּא פָּרַח בָּעוֹר טָהוֹר הוּא׃

English Translation

then the priest shall look: and, behold, if there be darkish white spots in the skin of their flesh; it is a tetter breaking out in the skin; he is clean.

Transliteration

Ve'ra'a hakohen ve'hineh ve'or-besaram beharot kehot levanot bohak hu parakh ba'or tahor hu.

Hebrew Leining Text

וְרָאָ֣ה הַכֹּהֵ֗ן וְהִנֵּ֧ה בְעוֹר־בְּשָׂרָ֛ם בֶּהָרֹ֖ת כֵּה֣וֹת לְבָנֹ֑ת בֹּ֥הַק ה֛וּא פָּרַ֥ח בָּע֖וֹר טָה֥וֹר הֽוּא׃ {ס}        

🎵 Listen to leining

Parasha Commentary

Verse Context in Leviticus

The verse (Vayikra 13:39) discusses the priestly examination of skin discolorations to determine whether they render a person ritually impure (tamei) or pure (tahor). Here, the Torah describes a condition called bohak—a dull white discoloration—and declares the person clean.

Rashi's Explanation

Rashi (Vayikra 13:39) clarifies that bohak is a benign discoloration, distinct from the more severe tzara'at (often mistranslated as "leprosy"). He notes that the phrase "כֵּהוֹת לְבָנֹת" ("dullish white") indicates a faded or weak whiteness, unlike the bright white of tzara'at.

Halachic Implications from Rambam

Rambam (Hilchot Tumat Tzara'at 1:6) rules that bohak is never impure, even if it spreads. This aligns with the verse's conclusion ("טָהוֹר הוּא"—"he is clean"). The distinction between bohak and tzara'at underscores that only specific discolorations with defined characteristics (e.g., depth, hair color changes) render impurity.

Symbolic Interpretation in Midrash

Midrash Tanchuma (Tazria 9) suggests that bohak represents superficial flaws that do not penetrate deeply, symbolizing minor moral failings that can be easily corrected. Unlike tzara'at—traditionally linked to lashon hara (evil speech)—bohak signifies transient imperfections requiring no isolation.

Key Takeaways from Talmudic Discussion

  • Nega'im vs. Bohak: The Talmud (Nega'im 1:4) emphasizes that bohak lacks the halachic signs of impurity (e.g., white hair, spreading in a specific manner).
  • Role of the Kohen: Even for benign conditions like bohak, the kohen's examination is mandatory, teaching that spiritual matters require expert discernment (Sifra, Tazria).

📚 Talmud Citations

This verse is quoted in the Talmud.

📖 Nega'im 1:1
The verse is discussed in the context of the laws concerning skin afflictions (tzara'at) and the priest's examination process to determine purity or impurity.
📖 Nega'im 3:1
The verse is referenced in the discussion about the appearance of white spots and their implications for the diagnosis of tzara'at.

Frequently Asked Questions

Q: What does Leviticus 13:39 mean?
A: Leviticus 13:39 discusses a skin condition where a person has dull white spots on their skin. According to the Torah, if a priest examines these spots and determines they are 'bohak' (a mild skin discoloration), the person is declared tahor (ritually pure). This is different from tzara'at (a more serious spiritual affliction), which would require quarantine or other measures.
Q: Why is this verse important in Jewish law?
A: This verse is important because it helps distinguish between serious skin afflictions (tzara'at) and harmless discolorations (bohak). The Torah assigns the kohen (priest) the responsibility to diagnose these conditions, emphasizing the spiritual and halachic (Jewish legal) implications of purity and impurity. Rashi explains that 'bohak' is not a disease but a superficial discoloration, so the person remains ritually clean.
Q: What can we learn from Leviticus 13:39 today?
A: We learn the importance of proper judgment and expertise in halachic matters. The Torah teaches that only a trained kohen could determine purity status, reminding us to consult knowledgeable rabbis for Jewish legal questions. Additionally, it highlights that not all physical irregularities have spiritual consequences—some, like bohak, are purely superficial.
Q: How does this apply to modern Jewish practice?
A: While we no longer have the Temple or kohanim performing these examinations, the principle remains relevant. Today, rabbis and poskim (halachic decisors) guide us in matters of ritual purity, health, and spirituality. The verse also teaches us not to hastily judge others based on external appearances, as not all conditions carry the same significance.
Q: What is 'bohak' according to Jewish tradition?
A: Bohak is a mild, non-contagious skin discoloration described in the Torah as dull white spots. Unlike tzara'at, which was often seen as a spiritual affliction requiring purification, bohak was considered harmless. The Talmud (Nega'im 1:4) and Rambam (Hilchot Tumat Tzara'at 1:6) clarify that it does not render a person impure and requires no special treatment.