share torah logo

Leviticus 14:57 - Distinguishing purity from impurity

Leviticus 14:57 - ויקרא 14:57

Hebrew Text

לְהוֹרֹת בְּיוֹם הַטָּמֵא וּבְיוֹם הַטָּהֹר זֹאת תּוֹרַת הַצָּרָעַת׃

English Translation

to teach when it is unclean, and when it is clean: this is the Tora of żara῾at.

Transliteration

Lehorot beyom hatame uveyom hatahor zot torat hatzara'at.

Hebrew Leining Text

לְהוֹרֹ֕ת בְּי֥וֹם הַטָּמֵ֖א וּבְי֣וֹם הַטָּהֹ֑ר זֹ֥את תּוֹרַ֖ת הַצָּרָֽעַת׃ <span class="mam-spi-pe">{פ}</span><br>
לְהוֹרֹ֕ת בְּי֥וֹם הַטָּמֵ֖א וּבְי֣וֹם הַטָּהֹ֑ר זֹ֥את תּוֹרַ֖ת הַצָּרָֽעַת׃ {פ}

🎵 Listen to leining

Parasha Commentary

Understanding the Verse in Context

The verse "לְהוֹרֹת בְּיוֹם הַטָּמֵא וּבְיוֹם הַטָּהֹר זֹאת תּוֹרַת הַצָּרָעַת" (Vayikra 13:59) concludes the detailed laws of tzara'at (often mistranslated as "leprosy," but more accurately referring to a spiritual affliction manifesting on skin, garments, or houses). The verse emphasizes the role of the kohen (priest) in determining the status of purity or impurity, underscoring the Torah's system of tumah and taharah (ritual impurity and purity).

Rashi's Commentary

Rashi explains that this verse serves as a summary of the entire parashah of tzara'at, stating that the kohen must be the one to declare whether a person, garment, or house is tamei (impure) or tahor (pure). He emphasizes that this determination is not based on medical diagnosis but on the kohen's adherence to the Torah's laws. Rashi also notes that the phrase "זֹאת תּוֹרַת הַצָּרָעַת" ("this is the law of tzara'at") parallels similar phrases in other Torah sections, indicating a structured legal framework.

Rambam's Perspective

In Hilchot Tumat Tzara'at (Laws of Tzara'at Impurity), Rambam elaborates on the procedural aspects of this verse. He clarifies that the kohen's declaration is binding even if he lacks expertise in identifying tzara'at, as the Torah grants this authority exclusively to the priesthood. Rambam further connects tzara'at to the broader concept of hashgachah pratit (divine providence), suggesting that these afflictions serve as divine warnings against lashon hara (evil speech) and other moral failings.

Midrashic Insights

The Midrash (Vayikra Rabbah 16:6) links tzara'at to the sin of arrogance, drawing a parallel between the swelling (se'et) of tzara'at and the "swelling" of pride. It teaches that the purification process—which often involves isolation—serves as a corrective measure, humbling the afflicted individual and encouraging repentance. The phrase "לְהוֹרֹת" ("to teach") is interpreted as a call to introspection, urging the individual to learn from their spiritual missteps.

Practical Halachic Implications

  • The kohen's role is irreplaceable in declaring tumah or taharah, even in the absence of the Temple (as discussed in Mishnah Negaim 3:1).
  • The distinction between "day of impurity" and "day of purity" highlights the dynamic nature of spiritual states, reflecting the possibility of repentance and renewal.
  • The term "תּוֹרַת" ("law") underscores that these rules are immutable divine statutes, not subject to human discretion.

📚 Talmud Citations

This verse is quoted in the Talmud.

📖 Nega'im 3:1
The verse is referenced in the Mishnah discussing the laws of leprosy (tzara'at), particularly in relation to determining the purity or impurity of a person affected by it.
📖 Arakhin 15b
The verse is cited in the context of discussing the laws and procedures related to tzara'at, emphasizing the importance of distinguishing between clean and unclean states.

Frequently Asked Questions

Q: What does 'the Tora of żara῾at' mean in Leviticus 14:57?
A: The 'Tora of żara῾at' refers to the detailed laws in the Torah regarding the skin affliction called 'tzara'at' (often mistranslated as leprosy). These laws teach the Kohanim (priests) how to diagnose and declare whether a person, garment, or house is ritually impure (tamei) or pure (tahor). Rashi explains that this verse summarizes the entire section's purpose—to provide clear guidance on these matters.
Q: Why is distinguishing between 'tamei' (unclean) and 'tahor' (clean) important in this verse?
A: In Judaism, the concepts of 'tamei' and 'tahor' relate to ritual purity, which affects a person's ability to participate in certain mitzvot (commandments), like entering the Temple or eating sanctified foods. The Talmud (Arachin 16a) teaches that tzara'at often comes as a consequence of lashon hara (evil speech), making these laws spiritually significant for self-improvement.
Q: How do the laws of tzara'at apply today without the Temple?
A: While we no longer have the Temple or Kohanim to diagnose tzara'at, the Rambam (Hilchot Tumat Tzara'at) explains that the deeper lessons remain relevant. The Talmud (Arachin 15b) connects tzara'at to moral failings like gossip and arrogance, teaching us to refine our speech and character—a timeless Jewish value.
Q: What can we learn from the phrase 'to teach when it is unclean and when it is clean'?
A: This emphasizes the Torah's role in providing clarity in spiritual matters. The Midrash (Vayikra Rabbah 16:1) notes that only a Kohen—a spiritual guide—could declare purity, teaching us to seek wisdom from Torah scholars when navigating complex ethical or halachic questions in life.