Join Our Newsletter To Be Informed When New Videos Are Posted
Join the thousands of fellow Studends who rely on our videos to learn how to read the bible in Hebrew for free!
Hebrew Text
עֶרְוַת כַּלָּתְךָ לֹא תְגַלֵּה אֵשֶׁת בִּנְךָ הִוא לֹא תְגַלֶּה עֶרְוָתָהּ׃
English Translation
Thou shalt not uncover the nakedness of thy daughter in law: she is thy son’s wife; thou shalt not uncover her nakedness.
Transliteration
Ervat kalatcha lo tgaley eshet bincha hi lo tgaley ervatah.
Hebrew Leining Text
עֶרְוַ֥ת כַּלָּֽתְךָ֖ לֹ֣א תְגַלֵּ֑ה אֵ֤שֶׁת בִּנְךָ֙ הִ֔וא לֹ֥א תְגַלֶּ֖ה עֶרְוָתָֽהּ׃ <span class="mam-spi-samekh">{ס}</span>
עֶרְוַ֥ת כַּלָּֽתְךָ֖ לֹ֣א תְגַלֵּ֑ה אֵ֤שֶׁת בִּנְךָ֙ הִ֔וא לֹ֥א תְגַלֶּ֖ה עֶרְוָתָֽהּ׃ {ס}
🎵 Listen to leining
Parasha Commentary
📚 Talmud Citations
This verse is quoted in the Talmud.
📖 Sanhedrin 54a
The verse is cited in a discussion about the prohibitions of incest and the specific relationships that are forbidden according to Torah law.
📖 Yevamot 21b
The verse is referenced in the context of discussing the laws of forbidden relationships and the implications for levirate marriage (yibbum).
Prohibition Against Relations with a Daughter-in-Law
The verse "עֶרְוַת כַּלָּתְךָ לֹא תְגַלֵּה אֵשֶׁת בִּנְךָ הִוא לֹא תְגַלֶּה עֶרְוָתָהּ" (Vayikra 18:15) explicitly forbids a father from engaging in forbidden relations with his son’s wife, his daughter-in-law. This prohibition is listed among the arayot</em (forbidden relationships) in the Torah and is considered a severe transgression.
Rashi’s Explanation
Rashi (Vayikra 18:15) emphasizes that this prohibition applies even if the son has divorced his wife or passed away, as long as she was once married to the son. The phrase "אֵשֶׁת בִּנְךָ הִוא" ("she is your son’s wife") reinforces that the prohibition remains in effect regardless of the son’s current marital status with her.
Rambam’s Legal Perspective
Rambam (Hilchot Issurei Biah 1:6) categorizes this prohibition as one of the issurei ervah</em (forbidden sexual relations) that are punishable by karet</em (spiritual excision) if violated intentionally and by malkot</em (lashes) if violated unintentionally. He further clarifies that this prohibition applies whether the son is alive or deceased, and whether the marriage was through kiddushin</em (betrothal) or nisu'in</em (full marriage).
Midrashic Insight
The Midrash (Sifra, Kedoshim 9:15) connects this prohibition to the episode of Yehuda and Tamar (Bereishit 38), where Yehuda unknowingly engaged with his daughter-in-law. Although Tamar’s actions were justified under the circumstances (as she sought to uphold the laws of yibbum), the Torah later formalized this prohibition to prevent such situations.
Practical Halachic Implications