share torah logo

Numbers 16:2 - Leaders challenge Moshe's authority?

Numbers 16:2 - במדבר 16:2

Hebrew Text

וַיָּקֻמוּ לִפְנֵי מֹשֶׁה וַאֲנָשִׁים מִבְּנֵי־יִשְׂרָאֵל חֲמִשִּׁים וּמָאתָיִם נְשִׂיאֵי עֵדָה קְרִאֵי מוֹעֵד אַנְשֵׁי־שֵׁם׃

English Translation

and they rose up before Moshe, with certain of the children of Yisra᾽el, two hundred and fifty princes of the assembly, regularly summoned to the congregation, men of renown:

Transliteration

Vayakumu lifnei Moshe va'anashim mibnei Yisrael chamishim u'matayim nesi'ei edah kri'ei mo'ed anshei-shem.

Hebrew Leining Text

וַיָּקֻ֙מוּ֙ לִפְנֵ֣י מֹשֶׁ֔ה וַאֲנָשִׁ֥ים מִבְּנֵֽי־יִשְׂרָאֵ֖ל חֲמִשִּׁ֣ים וּמָאתָ֑יִם נְשִׂיאֵ֥י עֵדָ֛ה קְרִאֵ֥י מוֹעֵ֖ד אַנְשֵׁי־שֵֽׁם׃
וַיָּקֻ֙מוּ֙ לִפְנֵ֣י מֹשֶׁ֔ה וַאֲנָשִׁ֥ים מִבְּנֵֽי־יִשְׂרָאֵ֖ל חֲמִשִּׁ֣ים וּמָאתָ֑יִם נְשִׂיאֵ֥י עֵדָ֛ה קְרִאֵ֥י מוֹעֵ֖ד אַנְשֵׁי־שֵֽׁם׃

🎵 Listen to leining

Parasha Commentary

Context in the Torah

This verse (Bamidbar 16:2) describes the rebellion of Korach and his followers against Moshe and Aharon. The 250 princes of the assembly were prominent leaders who joined Korach in challenging the authority of Moshe and the kehunah (priesthood) of Aharon.

Rashi's Explanation

Rashi notes that these men were "נְשִׂיאֵי עֵדָה" (princes of the assembly) who held positions of leadership in the Sanhedrin or other councils. He emphasizes that they were "אַנְשֵׁי־שֵׁם" (men of renown), indicating their high status in the community. Their prominence made their rebellion particularly dangerous, as it could sway public opinion against Moshe.

Rambam's Perspective

In Moreh Nevuchim (3:51), Rambam discusses how leadership disputes often arise from intellectual pride. These 250 men, though distinguished, erred in believing their own wisdom superseded Moshe's divinely appointed authority. Their status as "קְרִאֵי מוֹעֵד" (regularly summoned to the congregation) suggests they were accustomed to positions of influence, which may have fueled their arrogance.

Midrashic Insights

  • Bamidbar Rabbah (18:3) states these leaders were misled by Korach's rhetoric, despite their wisdom. Their downfall serves as a warning against following charismatic figures who oppose Torah authority.
  • Tanchuma (Korach 5) notes they were "men of name" who sought greater honor, illustrating how the pursuit of kavod (honor) can lead even great people astray.

Halachic Implications

The Chofetz Chaim (in Shmiras HaLashon) derives from this episode the severity of machlokes (dispute), especially when initiated by respected leaders. Their punishment (later in the parsha) underscores the Torah's strict view of challenging legitimate halachic authority.

📚 Talmud Citations

This verse is quoted in the Talmud.

📖 Sanhedrin 110a
The verse is referenced in the discussion about the rebellion of Korach and his followers, emphasizing the gravity of their challenge to Moshe's authority.

Frequently Asked Questions

Q: Who were the 250 princes mentioned in Numbers 16:2?
A: The 250 princes were leaders from the tribes of Israel who joined Korach in his rebellion against Moshe and Aharon. Rashi explains they were 'men of renown' (anshei shem) meaning they held important positions in the community, but were misled by Korach's arguments.
Q: Why did these leaders rebel against Moshe?
A: According to the Talmud (Sanhedrin 110a), Korach and these princes were jealous of the leadership positions given to Moshe and Aharon. They claimed 'all the congregation are holy' (Numbers 16:3) and argued there should be no hierarchy, failing to understand that Moshe's authority came directly from Hashem.
Q: What does 'regularly summoned to the congregation' mean in this verse?
A: The phrase 'kri'ei moed' (regularly summoned) means these were men who were regularly called upon for important communal matters. Ramban explains they were respected leaders who participated in assemblies and decisions, which made their rebellion particularly serious.
Q: What lesson can we learn from this rebellion?
A: The Midrash (Bamidbar Rabbah 18:3) teaches this episode warns against challenging proper Torah authority without just cause. Even great people can err when led by jealousy, showing the importance of humility and accepting divinely appointed leadership.
Q: How were these 250 princes punished?
A: Later in the parsha (Numbers 16:35), these 250 men were consumed by fire when they offered unauthorized incense. The Rambam (Hilchos Avodas Kochavim 5:4) cites this as an example of the severe consequences of improperly challenging Torah authority.