Join Our Newsletter To Be Informed When New Videos Are Posted
Join the thousands of fellow Studends who rely on our videos to learn how to read the bible in Hebrew for free!
Hebrew Text
וּלְמַטֵּה בְנֵי־זְבוּלֻן נָשִׂיא אֱלִיצָפָן בֶּן־פַּרְנָךְ׃
English Translation
And the prince of the tribe of the children of Zevulun, Eliżafan the son of Parnakh.
Transliteration
Ulematte venei-Zvulun nasi Elitzafan ben-Parnach.
Hebrew Leining Text
וּלְמַטֵּ֥ה בְנֵֽי־זְבוּלֻ֖ן נָשִׂ֑יא אֱלִיצָפָ֖ן בֶּן־פַּרְנָֽךְ׃
וּלְמַטֵּ֥ה בְנֵֽי־זְבוּלֻ֖ן נָשִׂ֑יא אֱלִיצָפָ֖ן בֶּן־פַּרְנָֽךְ׃
🎵 Listen to leining
Parasha Commentary
📚 Talmud Citations
This verse is not quoted in the Talmud.
Context in the Torah
The verse (Bamidbar 34:25) lists Eliẓafan ben Parnakh as the prince (נָשִׂיא) representing the tribe of Zevulun in the division of the Land of Israel. This appears in the context of the leaders appointed to oversee the distribution of tribal portions under the guidance of Elazar the Kohen and Yehoshua bin Nun.
Rashi's Commentary
Rashi (Bamidbar 34:25) notes that this Eliẓafan is the same individual mentioned earlier (Bamidbar 3:30) as the leader of the Kehatite family of Levi'im. This indicates that a Levite was chosen to represent Zevulun in dividing the land, despite Levites not receiving a territorial portion. Rashi explains that since the Levites were dispersed among the tribes, it was appropriate for them to participate in the allocation process.
Midrashic Insights
The Midrash (Bamidbar Rabbah 21:13) highlights the significance of Zevulun's representative being from the tribe of Levi. It connects this to the symbiotic relationship between Zevulun and Yissachar—where Zevulun engaged in commerce to support Yissachar's Torah study. The choice of a Levite as Zevulun's prince reinforces the tribe's spiritual role in facilitating Torah learning.
Name Analysis
Halachic Perspective
Rambam (Hilchot Terumot 1:2) derives from such verses that land division required representatives with integrity and Torah knowledge. A Levite's involvement ensured impartiality, as they had no personal stake in territorial claims.